The Shill Tries Again

Last night Bill 'The Shill' O'Reilly tried again to shovel O'bama's manure in defense of the unconstitutional military action in Libya.  Having dropped the false claims of 'Urgency' and 'Killing his own people' he resorted to the lie that America should take military action in any case "to save lives" generally.  The contention is asinine.  There are specifically delineated limits to the commitment of U.S. troops for any military action, and in the context of the rule of law, these enumerated limits must be followed, and if not, the unlawful actor must be held accountable by law.  In the case of Obama, he is a known criminal usurper, ineligible to hold office, and until proven otherwise, his acts and orders are null and void.   To be sure, there is more credibility to the claim that our military should take kinetic action to remove Obama, than to do the same of Gadhafi.
UPDATE: The Shill tries to further the false 'responsibility-to-protect' argument from the Sunstein/Power school of unconstitutional and illegal use of United States military force.  And once again, he falls on his face. What part of unconstitutional don't you understand, Mr. O'Reilly?