On the Rejection of the Transmutation Model of Evolution

False Illustration of Human Development

Man did not evolve from apes, or any other species.  After a review of the evolutionary evidence and the fossil record, I find Darwin's postulates wanting.  Therefore, I reject the two primary assertions made by Darwin, namely, the transmutation model and the common ancestor thesis.  I am often amused by the overt effort of those claiming to be experts in human anthropological history to construct evidence in support of the claim of Darwinian evolution.  Yet, the missing link remains elusive.  The assumption is that it is there, it just hasn't been found.  How scientific.  A Google search does not easily reveal anything other than the common ancestor model of evolution.  It appears to be a given.  Yet, such is not the case.  Let's be perfectly clear.  There exists no definitive physical evidence in the fossil record or otherwise of actual transmutation of the human species from ape, or any other species.  Or for that matter, the transmutation of any species into that of another.  The notion is purely speculative.  All existing physical evidence in the fossil record, and otherwise, supports the contention that humans have always been human.  Further, the same is true for every individual species of animal, such that a cat has always been a cat,  a dog a dog, and so forth.  The genetic map of each is unique and while some similarities exist within the genetic material no genetic evidence has been produced to support the contention that all of life has evolved from a common ancestor.  I contend that the same is true for plants as for animals.

A cogent analysis of the evidence supports the following hypotheses.  Humans have always been humans. That we have  adapted to our respective environments, as humans, and have promulgated from  common human ancestors.  That all variants to the species converge to the original form.  The same is true for the cat, and dog.  The same is true for all species of plant life.  Therefore, the tree of life does not have a common root, but as many roots as the vast diversity of plant and animal life.  Each an independent offshoot developing unto its own unique genetic code.  Darwin was, quite simply, wrong.